Kurt Warner Fires Back at Robert Griffin III Over Caleb Williams Controversy

Kurt Warner Fires Back at Robert Griffin III Over Caleb Williams Controversy

Chicago Bears quarterback Caleb Williams has been in the news for myriad reasons this offseason as fans, media, and former players continue to debate and discuss what he must do to become the leader coach Ben Johnson’s team needs.

The Bears got over 3,500 passing yards from the former USC Trojan during his rookie year at Soldier Field with the Bears but his efforts added up to a paltry five wins.

On Saturday, legendary NFL quarterback Kurt Warner weighed in on a recent controversy surrounding the Bears signal caller as he offered a retort to former NFL QB and college football Heisman Trophy winner Robert Griffin III. 

Kurt Warner and Brenda Warner during a Super Bowl LIX event in 2025. © Kirby Lee-Imagn Images

Warner’s long-winded response garnered over 800 thousand views on Saturday heading toward Sunday as he responded to Griffin’s round of question on the Bears’ coaching staff.

“Caleb Williams not being taught what to watch on film weekly by his Chicago coaches last year was coaching malpractice,” Griffin III wrote on Williams.

“Just because it’s the NFL doesn’t mean that the development stops. If you want your QB to see the game like you, then teach him how to watch tape like you do,” he continued. 

Warner challenged RGIII’s assertion saying that he was never taught how to watch film by his coaches, although he did watch film with them and developed his own habits in the film room during his playing days. 

Warner and Griffin III continued to chat in the comments section with Griffin III stating that Warner overcame bad coaching.

Warner expounded on his comments, making a comment of his own on Griffin’s choice of the word “malpractice.” 

Related: Caleb Williams’ New List of Dietary Restrictions Makes Waves on Social Media


#Kurt #Warner #Fires #Robert #Griffin #III #Caleb #Williams #Controversy

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *